Opinion

Walter v. City of Gulf Shores

829 So. 2d 186
2002 Ala. LEXIS 87
2002 WL 363718

Court: Supreme Court of Alabama
Filed: Mar 8, 2002
Status: Published
Author: Johnstone
On the bench: Brown, Harwood, Houston, Johnstone, Lyons, Moore, See, Stuart, Woodall
Cited by: 1 cases
Authority: More cited than 0.9%

The opinion

JOHNSTONE, Justice

(dissenting).

I join Justice Harwood in his scholarly dissent. I add that, in my opinion, the content of Walter’s ads was no harm to the public, much less any “real” harm and therefore was, and is, not an appropriate target for regulation within the test enun- *196 dated by Edenfield v. Fane, 507 U.S. 761 , 113 S.Ct. 1792, 123 . L.Ed.2d 543 (1993).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.