Opinion
The opinion
11 GASKINS, J.,
dissenting.
While the contested provisions of this insurance policy are confusing and ambiguous on the issue of ownership requirements, I do not find the policy to be ambiguous on its exclusion of coverage for recreational vehicles used off the covered premises.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.
A word about cookies
We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.