granting a petition for writ of certiorari where the trial court cut approximately $8,000 from the bill for investigative costs based on its “inherent discretionary authority” rather than specific concerns about the *886 items listed in the bills
How later courts described this case
- granting a petition for writ of certiorari where the trial court cut approximately $8,000 from the bill for investigative costs based on its “inherent discretionary authority” rather than specific concerns about the *886 items listed in the bills
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
SHAHOOD, Judge,
dissenting.
I would deny the petition for writ of certiora-ri. While the trial court did not articulate the words “reasonable and necessary” with respect to the investigative fees, my review and analysis of the record leads me to conclude that the court did consider the same in accordance with Carrasquillo v. State, 502 So.2d 505 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).