Opinion

Westinghouse Electric v. Widlan

  • 623 So. 2d 511
  • 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4351
  • 1993 WL 116707
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Apr 16, 1993
Status
Published
On the bench
Booth, Kahn, Mickle
Cited by
3 cases

holding a Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) has jurisdiction over issues concerning compensa-bility

How later courts described this case

  • holding a Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) has jurisdiction over issues concerning compensa-bility

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

OPINION ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Having considered Appellee/Claim-ant’s Motion for Reconsideration of the Denial of Attorney’s fees, we grant the motion and remand the cause to the Judge of Compensation Claims to revisit the issue of trial attorney’s fees and to address specifically whether bad faith existed. See section 440.-34(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1987). In response to the denial of Claimant’s motion for appellate attorney’s fees, Claimant correctly maintained that the Employer/Carrier had initiated appellate proceedings and that Claimant had prevailed on the only substantive issue on appeal. Accordingly, we find Claimant is entitled to an appellate fee award *515 pursuant to section 440.34(5), Florida Statutes (1987).

BOOTH, KAHN and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.