Opinion

Robertson v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Medicine

574 So. 2d 153
1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4516
1990 WL 85424

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed: Jun 19, 1990
Status: Published
On the bench: Ford, Miner, Ret, Smith, Thompson, Wolf
Cited by: 3 cases

The opinion

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

In our original opinion we noted (see footnote 1) the absence from the record of certain depositions, transcript of proceedings before the Board, and exhibits before the hearing officer. In his motion for rehearing, appellant moved for leave to supplement the record. We granted appellant’s motion, and appellant thereafter designated, and the Department supplied, the depositions of Drs. Litton and Baker, and the transcript of proceedings before the Board. Having reviewed the supplemental record, and finding nothing to alter our decision based upon the record as initially presented, we adhere to our opinion and decision filed on June 19, 1990, deny rehearing, and order that mandate be issued in accordance therewith.

SMITH, MINER and WOLF * , JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.