Opinion

Forstall v. Daigrepont

  • 551 So. 2d 653
  • 1989 La. App. LEXIS 1619
  • 1989 WL 112070
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Filed
Sep 28, 1989
Status
Published
On the bench
Becker, Ciaccio, Garrison
Cited by
3 cases

The opinion

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

Plaintiff, Barry A. Forstall, has filed an application for rehearing in this matter. In his application, plaintiff alleges that the opinion of this Court rendered on September 28, 1989 is incorrect as to the date of the accident and the dates of the resulting treatment of two of the medical doctors.

Our review of the record reveals the following:

1. The date of the vehicular collision made the subject of this lawsuit occurred on July 21, 1984.

2. Dr. C.B. Scrignar began treating plaintiff on March 24, 1986 approximately one year and eight months after the accident.

3. Dr. Robert Newman began treating plaintiff on March 1, 1985, approximately eight months after the accident.

Our opinion rendered on September 28, 1989 is hereby amended to reflect the above corrections. Except as amended herein, the application for rehearing is denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.