Opinion

Benoit, Inc. v. District Board of Trustees of St. Johns River Community College of Florida

  • 10 Fla. L. Weekly 387
  • 463 So. 2d 1260
  • 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14930
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Aug 30, 1984
Status
Published
Author
Sharp
On the bench
Church, Cobb, Frank, Sharp
Cited by
6 cases
Authority
More cited than 26.2%

agreeing with Atwater v. Gulf Maintenance & Supply, 424 So.2d 135 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), that “any part of a letter offering a settlement between the parties is barred by section 90.408;” “[t]he old common law rule was that statements of independent facts made in an offer to compromise were admissible;” “[t]his section alters the common law rule by giving greater protection to the offeror, thus furthering the public policy of this state which favors amicable settlement of disputes and avoidance of litigation” (footnotes omitted)

How later courts described this case

  • agreeing with Atwater v. Gulf Maintenance & Supply, 424 So.2d 135 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), that “any part of a letter offering a settlement between the parties is barred by section 90.408;” “[t]he old common law rule was that statements of independent facts made in an offer to compromise were admissible;” “[t]his section alters the common law rule by giving greater protection to the offeror, thus furthering the public policy of this state which favors amicable settlement of disputes and avoidance of litigation” (footnotes omitted)
  • agreeing with Atwater v. Gulf Maintenance & Supply, 424 So.2d 135 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982
  • noting that protecting the offeror furthers the state’s public policy favoring settlement

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

SHARP, Judge.

We grant appellee’s motion for rehearing in order to clarify our previous opinion. We continue to adhere to our previous opinion in which we held that the trial court erred in its admission of certain evidence proffered by appellee.

We emphasize, however, that we reverse for a new trial on both liability and damages despite the fact that the issue of admissibility of evidence goes solely to the question of liability because “the pleadings *1262 and evidence raise issues so interrelating liability and damages that we think justice would thus be served by a new trial on both liability and damages.” Swan v. Wisdom, 386 So.2d 574, 576 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

MOTION FOR REHEARING GRANTED.

COBB, C.J., and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.