Opinion

WHITNEY NATIONAL BANK OF NEW ORLEANS v. DERBES

  • 436 So. 2d 1185
  • 1983 La. App. LEXIS 8708
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Filed
Jun 3, 1983
Status
Published
Author
Barry
On the bench
Augustine, Barry, Lobrano, Schott, Ward
Cited by
10 cases

The opinion

BARRY, Judge,

would grant a rehearing.

I disagree with the majority’s treatment of the imputation clause for the detailed reasons in my dissent.

O’Quinn raises a number of substantial issues, some of which are treated summarily and one of which was ignored:

“I should also point out that the majority has failed to treat O’Quinn’s argument relative to the Difficiency Judgment Act. Serious questions were raised and are unanswered which could effectively alter the majority’s disposition of this obligation.” (See Dissent, pp. 1199-1200.)

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.