The opinion
ON REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
In their application for rehearing the indorsers complain that we did not address their argument that they were discharged because of the Louisiana Deficiency Judgment Act, LSA C.C.P. Arts. 2771 and 2772, R.S. 13:4106, and they ask for a rehearing on this basis.
*1201 The Deficiency Judgment Act has no application to the case because the indorsers had no interest in the property foreclosed upon and the property was sold with appraisement after due notice to the owners of the property. Cameron Brown South, Inc. v. East Glen Oaks, 341 So.2d 450 (La.App. 1st Cir.1976), Ford Motor Credit Company v. Soileau, 323 So.2d 221 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1975), Gumina v. Dupas, 178 So.2d 291 (La.App. 4th Cir.1965), writs refused 248 La. 442 , 179 So.2d 430 (1965).
REHEARING DENIED.