whether it is apodictic that one who is a party has no standing to object to a subpoena issued to a non-party witness unless that subpoena asks for documents in which the party claims some personal right or privilege or asks for documents in the party's possession
How later courts described this case
- whether it is apodictic that one who is a party has no standing to object to a subpoena issued to a non-party witness unless that subpoena asks for documents in which the party claims some personal right or privilege or asks for documents in the party's possession
- “It is apodictic that one who is a party has no standing to object to a subpoena issued to a non-party witness unless that subpoena asks for documents in which the party claims some personal right or privilege or asks for documents in the party’s possession.”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
BASKIN, Judge,
dissenting.
Because the petitioner has an adequate remedy by direct appeal I would deny certiorari. See United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Graham, 404 So.2d 863 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), review denied, review dismissed, 419 So.2d 1195 , 1201 (Fla.1982); Ford Motor Co. v. Edwards, 363 So.2d 867 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).