Opinion

Fort Lauderdale Board of Adjustment v. Nash

  • 425 So. 2d 578
  • 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22268
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Dec 22, 1982
Status
Published
On the bench
Downey, Hersey, Letts
Cited by
4 cases

The opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING OR CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

This Court’s opinion does not have the effect of precluding subsequent litigation in *580 the appropriate forum of the issue of whether a violation of the City’s set back requirements in fact exists. Accordingly, the Motion for Rehearing or Clarification is denied.

LETTS, C.J., and DOWNEY and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.