Opinion

Lacey Township Board of Education v. Lacey Township Education Ass'n

130 N.J. 312
613 A.2d 1162
142 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2639
1992 N.J. LEXIS 1047

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Filed: Oct 20, 1992
Status: Published
Author: Pollockgaribaldi
On the bench: Affirmance, Clifford, Garibaldi, Handler, Hern, Pollock, Reversal, Stein, Wilentz
Cited by: 0 cases
Authority: More cited than 23.6%

The opinion

POLLOCK and GARIBALDI, JJ.,

dissenting.

We would reverse, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Gruccio’s dissenting opinion, reported at 259 N.J.Super. 397, 400 , 613 A.2d 1167, 1169 (1991).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, O’HERN and STEIN — 5.

For reversal — Justices POLLOCK and GARIBALDI — 2.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.