Opinion

Union Township Teachers Ass'n ex rel. Allen v. Board of Education

  • 90 N.J. 161
  • 447 A.2d 524
  • 1982 N.J. LEXIS 2146
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Filed
Jun 24, 1982
Status
Published
Author
Pashman
On the bench
Pashman, Schreiber
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 23.3%

The opinion

PASHMAN, J.,

dissenting.,

I dissent from the Court’s decision regarding the applicability of laches and the contract statute of limitations to this ease, for the reasons expressed in my dissent in Lavin v. Board of Education of Hackensack, 90 N.J. 145 (1982). I would hold that the statute of limitations applies, but not laches.

Justice CLIFFORD and Justice HANDLER join in this opinion.

For modification and affirmance—Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices SCHREIBER, POLLOCK and O’HERN-4.

For reversal and remandment—Justices PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and HANDLER—3.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.