Opinion

Miriam Homes, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

  • 75 N.J. 508
  • 384 A.2d 143
  • 1978 N.J. LEXIS 163
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Filed
Mar 13, 1978
Status
Published
Author
Pashmanschbeibee
On the bench
Pashman, Schbeibee
Cited by
7 cases

5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned

How later courts described this case

  • 5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

.Pashman and Schbeibee, JJ.,

dissenting. We dissent essentially for the reasons stated in Judge Horn's dissenting opinion. It is our understanding that, although the majority has approved zoning the plaintiff's property into idleness, the plaintiff is not precluded from instituting an action for' inverse condemnation or other appropriate relief to avoid payment of taxes on sterile property.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes, Justices Sullivan and Clifford and Judge Conford — 4.

For reversal — Justices Pashman and Schreiber — 2.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.