Opinion

Armour & Co. v. Board of State Affairs

  • 156 La. 661
  • 101 So. 13
  • 1924 La. LEXIS 2072
Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Filed
Mar 24, 1924
Status
Published
On the bench
Brunot, Niell, Rogers
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 20.2%

The opinion

On Application for Rehearing.

By the WHOLE COURT.

PER CURIAM.

It appears that the views which we have expressed in the present suit are in conflict with the opinion in Colonial Sugars Co. v. Board of State Affairs et al. (two cases) 154 La. 971 , 98 South. 546 . If the former opinion is correct, the present opinion is incorrect, and vice versa.

After re-examining the legal questions involved, we prefer to adhere to our present opinion as containing the correct exposition of the law. Opinion in the cases of Colonial Sugars Co. v. Board of State Affairs et al., referred to supra, are, therefore, expressly overruled.

Rehearing refused.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.