Opinion

O'Leary v. Board of Port Com'rs for Port of New Orleans

  • 150 La. 649
  • 91 So. 139
  • 1922 La. LEXIS 2609
Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Filed
Jan 2, 1922
Status
Published
Author
Stx
On the bench
Because, Clause, Compénsation, Difficulties, Niell, Plaintiff, Right, Sommerville, Stx
Cited by
13 cases

“Where in an offer for bidders to a contract ... the-bidders were warned to examine the location of the proposed work and acquaint themselves with existing conditions, plaintiff, having accepted, cannot complain of the character and amount of work to be performed under the contract.”

How later courts described this case

  • “Where in an offer for bidders to a contract ... the-bidders were warned to examine the location of the proposed work and acquaint themselves with existing conditions, plaintiff, having accepted, cannot complain of the character and amount of work to be performed under the contract.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

On Rehearing.

PROVO STX, J.

For the reasons assigned in the original opinion herein, from which a rehearing was granted, the judgment heretofore handed down herein is reinstated, and made the judgment of this court.

O’NIELL, J., dissents.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.