Opinion

Temporary Protective Order A.N. v. K.G.

  • 24 N.E.3d 989
Court
Indiana Court of Appeals
Filed
Jan 21, 2014
Status
Published
Author
Robb
On the bench
Kirsch, Riley, Robb
Cited by
30 cases

holding that a single incident of domestic violence in a child's presence may support a CHINS finding, and it need not necessarily be repetitive

How later courts described this case

  • holding that a single incident of domestic violence in a child's presence may support a CHINS finding, and it need not necessarily be repetitive
  • stating that a single incident of Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 24A-JC-70 | September 4, 2024 Page 10 of 13 domestic violence in a child’s presence may support a CHINS finding
  • noting that, although there were no further reported cases of violence when the trial court issued its CHINS finding, that “by no means proves that … the domestic violence problems had been solved”
  • noting that, in CHINS cases, a child may be “endangered” even if the child is not actually “physically or emotionally harmed”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ROBB, Chief Judge,

concurring with opinion.

I believe the trial court was precariously close to crossing the line of acceptable intervention into the course of these proceedings. Had the evidence of A.N.’s impermissible contacts not been so strong, the trial court’s actions may have been enough to compromise the parties’ rights to a fair trial. However, because the evidence that A.N. violated the protective order is overwhelming, I agree that the trial court’s contempt order should be affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.