Opinion

Meza v. Bruce Packing Co.

  • 186 Or. App. 452
  • 63 P.3d 1193
  • 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 263
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Filed
Feb 19, 2003
Status
Published
Author
Schuman
On the bench
Edmonds, Kistler, Schuman
Cited by
2 cases

explaining significance of “good cause” as used in ORS 656.319,2 relating to timeliness of request for hearing

How later courts described this case

  • explaining significance of “good cause” as used in ORS 656.319,2 relating to timeliness of request for hearing

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

SCHUMAN, J.,

dissenting.

I agree with everything in this opinion except the conclusion. In my opinion, claimant’s confusion resulted in major part from insurer’s initial nonresponsiveness followed by its written denial, and the confusion amounted to “good cause” for failing to file her request for a hearing on time. The board acted outside its lawful range of discretion in concluding otherwise.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.