holding that the Casino Control Act did not vest the CCC with exclusive primary jurisdiction over a gambler's claims against a casino for his losses
How later courts described this case
- holding that the Casino Control Act did not vest the CCC with exclusive primary jurisdiction over a gambler's claims against a casino for his losses
- holding that decision to allow use of witnesses or exhibits not previously identified is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard
- listing the factors for reviewing a district court’s decision to permit introduction of exhibits not identified in the pretrial order
- a single remark that “took up only a few moments” was insufficient to demonstrate reasonable probability of jury influence
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING
Oct. 19, 1994
The petition for rehearing filed by the appellant-cross-appellee Leonard H. Tose, in the above captioned matter having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court and to all the other available circuit judges of the court in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition for rehearing is denied.