reversing for judge’s failure to disqualify himself on retrial, where judge had stated: “‘This case may be tried again, and it will be tried before me. I will see to that. And I will see that the woman gets another verdict and judgment that will stand’ ”
How later courts described this case
- reversing for judge’s failure to disqualify himself on retrial, where judge had stated: “‘This case may be tried again, and it will be tried before me. I will see to that. And I will see that the woman gets another verdict and judgment that will stand’ ”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Mr. Justice Bean
delivered the following dissenting opinion.
I think the instructions to the jury, taken as a whole, are correct. This is the second appeal of the case, and it should he affirmed under the provisions of Article VII, Section 3, of the Constitution, which was enacted by the people for the purpose of preventing numerous appeals in a case.