Opinion

Bailey v. Benton County

  • 61 Or. 390
  • 111 P. 376
  • 1910 Ore. LEXIS 211
Court
Oregon Supreme Court
Filed
Nov 1, 1910
Status
Published
Author
Moore
On the bench
McBbede, McBride, Moore, Took
Cited by
14 cases
Authority
More cited than 89.3%

The opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moore.

This is a motion to strike from an abstract certain testimony, on the ground that it was not copied from the bill of exceptions. The transcript sent up contains a bill of exceptions showing that it was signed by the judge, and appended to the record is the certificate of the clerk, wherein he asserts that the transcript contains a full, complete and true copy of the bill of exceptions. An examination of the bill referred to reveals that it *392 embraces the identical testimony assailed. If any mistake has been made in the appellant’s abstract, the respondent can file an additional abstract and- have the record corrected. Rule 5 of the Supreme Court ( 50 Or. 572 : 91 Pac. viii ).

• Until an amendment has been made in the manner indicated, the motion should be denied; and it is ordered.

Motion Denied.

Decided April 9, 1912.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.