Opinion

Kadderly v. Portland

  • 44 Or. 118
  • 74 P. 710
  • 1903 Ore. LEXIS 18
Court
Oregon Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 21, 1903
Status
Published
Author
Bean
On the bench
Bean
Cited by
125 cases

initiative and referendum does not abolish or destroy the republican form of government, or substitute another in its place

How later courts described this case

  • initiative and referendum does not abolish or destroy the republican form of government, or substitute another in its place
  • initiative and referendum does not abolish or destroy the republican form of government, or substitute or destroy the republican form of government or substitute another in its place
  • on reh’g 75 P 22 (1904)

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

Mr. Justice Bean

delivered the opinion.

18. The object of this suit was to enjoin the City of Portland from reassessing the property of the plaintiffs for a street improvement previously made in front thereof. The fact that the contractors for the original improvement and the owners of the warrants issued on account thereof were made parties to the suit does not authorize it to be now changed from its original purpose, and converted into a suit by taxpayers of the city to cancel illegal municipal warrants. The decree was in all things affirmed, and there is no reason why the ordinary rule as to costs should not obtain. The petition is denied. Rehearing Denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.