Opinion

De Leon v. Rhines

  • 74 F.2d 477
  • 64 App. D.C. 73
  • 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 3997
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
Dec 3, 1934
Status
Published
Author
Groner
On the bench
Groner, Hitz, Martin, Robb
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 16.1%

The opinion

GRONER, Associate Justice.

I concur on the authority of Wolfe v. Murphy, 47 App. D. C. 296. The doctrine announced there has been accepted as the law in the District of Columbia for more than fifteen years, and to disturb it now would doubtless create more confusion than advantage, but I am constrained to say that if the question were new, I should reach a wholly different conclusion. See Union Ins. Co. v. Hanford, 143 U. S. 187 -190, 12 S. Ct. 437 , 36 L. Ed. 118 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.