Opinion

United States v. Lawrence

  • 11 Ct. Cust. 203
  • 1921 CCPA LEXIS 59
  • 1921 WL 21148
Court
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Filed
Dec 14, 1921
Status
Published
Author
Smith
On the bench
Barber, Martin, Smith, Vries
Cited by
4 cases

The opinion

CONCURRING OPINION.

Smith, Judge:

It is the duty of the collector to classify goods and the duty of the appraiser to determine their value. When therefore it comes to the classification of goods and such classification is determined under the statute by their value, it seems to me that the collector must accept the appraised or official value for classification purposes and classify the goods accordingly. If such classification brings the merchandise within the terms of the free list, the merchandise should be admitted free, but if the classification according to their appraised value subjects the merchandise to duty, then in compliance with the express mandate of paragraph I of Section XII, the rate of duty should be applied to the entered, not the appraised, value.

The decisions of the Supreme Court cited by Judge Martin definitely settle, however, that the entered value determines classification, and for that reason I concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.