Opinion

Chas. H. Demarest, Inc. v. United States

  • 44 C.C.P.A. 133
Court
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Filed
Apr 30, 1957
Status
Published
Author
Worley
On the bench
Because, Cole, Connell, Herein, Illness, Jacicson, Jackson, Johnson, Place, Recalled, Rich, Worley
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Worley, Judge,

concurring.

I agree with the conclusion reached by the majority for the sole reason that the trimming of the stalks to predetermined lengths to facilitate their use for a specific purpose was, under the facts here, a manufacturing step within the meaning of paragraph 1558. In view of that conclusion I doubt the necessity of determining whether the other treatments to which the stalks were subjected constituted a partial manufacture.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.