observing that in nonregulatory takings cases, the deprivation of any economically viable use of land is sufficient to constitute a taking
How later courts described this case
- observing that in nonregulatory takings cases, the deprivation of any economically viable use of land is sufficient to constitute a taking
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Lundberg Stratton, J.,
dissenting. I dissent and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals that appellants are not entitled to a writ of mandamus.
Pfeifer, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.