Opinion

State ex rel. SuperAmerica Group v. Licking County Board of Elections

  • 80 Ohio St. 3d 182
  • 685 N.E.2d 507
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Oct 1, 1997
Status
Published
Author
Pfeifer
On the bench
Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Only, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
Cited by
39 cases

"In election-related matters, extreme diligence and promptness are required. Extraordinary relief has been routinely denied in election-related cases based on laches."

How later courts described this case

  • "In election-related matters, extreme diligence and promptness are required. Extraordinary relief has been routinely denied in election-related cases based on laches."

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Pfeifer, J.,

concurring. In my view, the writs should be denied because the referendum petition in question did not contain significant inaccuracies and because the ordinance was indeed subject to referendum.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.