Opinion

Tzangas, Plakas & Mannos v. Administrator

  • 73 Ohio St. 3d 694
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Sep 13, 1995
Status
Published
Author
Wright
On the bench
Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
341 cases

the statute setting forth the appeals process for unemployment compensation cases “does not create distinctions between the scope of 7. review of common pleas courts and appellate courts”

How later courts described this case

  • the statute setting forth the appeals process for unemployment compensation cases “does not create distinctions between the scope of 7. review of common pleas courts and appellate courts”
  • " '[A] reviewing court may reverse the board's determination only if it is unlawful, unreasonable, or against the manifest weight of the evidence.' "
  • " 'Fault on the employee's part separates him from the Act's intent and the Act's protection.' "

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Wright, J.,

concurring. I concur in paragraphs one, two, and three of the syllabus and the judgment only.

Cook, J., concurs in the foregoing concurring opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.