Opinion

State ex rel. Lake County Board of Commissioners v. Weaver

  • 67 Ohio St. 3d 160
  • 616 N.E.2d 890
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Aug 18, 1993
Status
Published
Author
Douglas
On the bench
Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 15.2%

The opinion

Douglas, J.,

concurring in part and dissenting in part. The majority confuses the years in question and the various judgments of the court of appeals. I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals in its findings that, for 1989, the court’s budget should have been increased by $182,996.96 offset by $49,151 paid from the county general fund for unemployment compensation, for a net of $133,845.96 to be added to the court’s 1989 budget. I would reverse the court of *164 appeals’ finding as to an interest assessment, although I certainly can see why the judges of the court of appeals took, in their wisdom, a position that is both arguable and intellectually defensible and entered such an order. See, generally, Beifuss v. Westerville Bd. of Edn. (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 187 , 525 N.E.2d 20 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.