recognizing that appeals pursuant to former R.C. 4123.519 (now 4123.512)2 are “subject to de novo review” while holding that the only decisions reviewable pursuant to the statute “are those decisions involving a claimant’s right to participate or to continue to participate in the fund”
How later courts described this case
- recognizing that appeals pursuant to former R.C. 4123.519 (now 4123.512)2 are “subject to de novo review” while holding that the only decisions reviewable pursuant to the statute “are those decisions involving a claimant’s right to participate or to continue to participate in the fund”
- recognizing that appeals pursuant to former R.C. 4123.519 (now 4123.512
- overruling State ex rel. O.M. Scott & Sons Co. v. Indus. Comm. [1986], 28 Ohio St.3d 341, 28 OBR 406, 503 N.E.2d 1032, and Seabloom Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. Mayfield [1988], 35 Ohio St.3d 108, 519 N.E.2d 358
- holding a non-final order setting the matter for further hearing cannot be appealed under R.C. 4123.512
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Sweeney, J.,
dissents based on his votes in State, ex rel. O.M. Scott & Sons Co., v. Indus. Comm. (1986), 28 Ohio St.3d 341 , 28 OBR 406, 503 N.E.2d 1032 , and Seabloom Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. Mayfield (1988), 35 Ohio St.3d 108 , 519 N.E.2d 358 .