Opinion

Akron Bar Ass'n v. Chandler

  • 62 Ohio St. 3d 471
  • 584 N.E.2d 677
  • 1992 Ohio LEXIS 211
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Feb 12, 1992
Status
Published
Author
Resnick
On the bench
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Only, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
5 cases

The opinion

Alice Robie Resnick, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the majority decision and would permanently disbar respondent from the practice of law as the board has recommended.

The record in this case is very limited and it is difficult for me to determine how the panel came to the conclusion that respondent was “apparently engaged in a low-level enterprise to distribute cocaine * * At the time of respondent’s arrest he was found to be in possession of eight hundred fifty grams of cocaine. This is not a low-level amount by anyone’s standards. Not only was respondent using cocaine, but he was also trafficking in it in order to support his habit. Upon conviction he was sentenced to thirty-three months’ incarceration by the federal court. There is no question that respondent has seriously violated the trust that was granted him when he was admitted to the practice of law.

I would follow the recommendation of the board and permanently disbar Chandler from the practice of law.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.