Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Spitz

  • 62 Ohio St. 3d 178
  • 580 N.E.2d 1071
  • 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2868
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 11, 1991
Status
Published
Author
Brown
On the bench
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
4 cases

The opinion

Herbert R. Brown, J.,

dissenting. In this case the panel who heard the evidence believed the appropriate sanction to be a public reprimand. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline also recommended a public reprimand as the appropriate sanction. Considering the record, I would not reject those recommendations.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.