Opinion

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Gabriel

  • 57 Ohio St. 3d 18
  • 565 N.E.2d 570
  • 1991 Ohio LEXIS 22
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Jan 9, 1991
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Reilly, Snick, Sweeney, Tenth, Wright
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 63.3%

a public reprimand was the appropriate sanction for an attorney who represented both an automobile driver and passenger without full disclosure and consent

How later courts described this case

  • a public reprimand was the appropriate sanction for an attorney who represented both an automobile driver and passenger without full disclosure and consent

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we find that respondent committed the misconduct found by the board. We concur with the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, we hereby publicly reprimand respondent. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Reilly, JJ., concur.

Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent.

Archer E. Reilly, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for Re snick, J.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.