Opinion

State ex rel. City of Canfield v. Frost

  • 53 Ohio St. 3d 13
  • 557 N.E.2d 1206
  • 1990 Ohio LEXIS 315
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Aug 1, 1990
Status
Published
Author
Douglas
On the bench
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Snick, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
7 cases

The opinion

Douglas, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent. The appellee has an adequate remedy at law by way of appeal and thus prohibition in this case is not proper. Further, a civil service commission has a right to interpret its own rules. In this case, those rules accord appellant a right of appeal. Therefore, again, prohibition should not lie.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.