Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bell

39 Ohio St. 3d 276
530 N.E.2d 404
1988 Ohio LEXIS 359

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Nov 9, 1988
Status: Published
On the bench: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by: 3 cases
Authority: More cited than 82.6%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the entire record before us, we agree with the board’s recommendation. While petitioner has already been precluded from practicing law for four years, 1 the gravity of his misconduct continues to persuade us that he is unworthy of the public’s trust. The petition for reinstatement is denied.

Petition denied.

Moyer, C.J., Locher, Holmes, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Sweeney and Douglas, JJ., dissent.

Petitioner was initially suspended from practicing law on August 23, 1983, due to his conviction for violating R.C. 2921.13 (falsification).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.