Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Soucek

  • 37 Ohio St. 3d 42
  • 523 N.E.2d 513
  • 1988 Ohio LEXIS 136
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
May 25, 1988
Status
Published
Author
Wright
On the bench
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
4 cases

a lawyer, who negotiated a guilty plea to the charge of cocaine possession with intent to distribute, was indefinitely suspended from the practice of law

How later courts described this case

  • a lawyer, who negotiated a guilty plea to the charge of cocaine possession with intent to distribute, was indefinitely suspended from the practice of law

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Wright, J.,

dissenting. The facts in this case indicate that respondent participated in — indeed, he was the driving force behind — a $200,000 illegal drug deal. Therefore, I believe that permanent disbarment would be a more appropriate sanction.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.