Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica

35 Ohio St. 3d 264
520 N.E.2d 221
1988 Ohio LEXIS 60

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Mar 16, 1988
Status: Published
On the bench: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by: 3 cases
Authority: More cited than 72.1%

commingling of estate funds with personal bank account; dishonesty

How later courts described this case

commingling of estate funds with personal bank account; dishonesty

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Per Curiam.

This court finds that respondent violated the aforementioned Disciplinary Rules. Accordingly, we adopt both the board’s findings and its recommendation. Respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and Wright, JJ., concur.

*266 Douglas and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.