Opinion

Arlow v. Ohio Rehabilitation Services Commission

  • 24 Ohio St. 3d 153
  • 24 Ohio B. 371
  • 493 N.E.2d 1337
  • 1986 Ohio LEXIS 662
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Jun 25, 1986
Status
Published
Author
Brown
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
23 cases

The opinion

Clifford F. Brown, J.,

concurring. I concur in the thorough analysis and result reached in these cases by Justice Locher.

I make this added observation. The pertinent language of R.C. 119.12 mandated the agency, the State Personnel Board of Review, to “prepare and certify to the court a complete record of the proceedings” in each case. This statute does not require that the record of the agency contain the case number of the common pleas court to which the appeal is taken or any other numerical designation, nor does it require any description, cap *157 tion or cover page. The mandatory duty imposed upon the agency is fully performed when the agency certifies “to the court a complete record.” That was done in each case.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.