Opinion

Whitt v. Columbus Cooperative Enterprises

  • 64 Ohio St. 2d 355
  • 415 N.E.2d 985
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 30, 1980
Status
Published
Author
Holmes
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Dowd, Eighth, Holmes, Locher, Stillman, Sweeney
Cited by
13 cases
Authority
More cited than 15.1%

“If the General Assembly had wished to protect groups which are not traditionally associated with malpractice, such as optometrists and dentists, it would have listed them”

How later courts described this case

  • “If the General Assembly had wished to protect groups which are not traditionally associated with malpractice, such as optometrists and dentists, it would have listed them”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Holmes, J.,

concurring. On the basis of this court’s determination in Hocking Conservancy Disk v. Dodson-Lindblom Assoc. (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 195 , and the doctrine of stare decisis, I must concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.