Opinion

American Chemical Society v. Kinney

  • 62 Ohio St. 2d 258
  • 16 Ohio Op. 3d 288
  • 405 N.E.2d 272
  • 1980 Ohio LEXIS 733
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
May 28, 1980
Status
Published
Author
Holmes
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Herbert, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney
Cited by
5 cases
Authority
More cited than 15.1%

holding that the phrase “public institution of learning” in a tax statute may encompass more than “a college or academy in the traditional sense,” but that any such institution must have “a teacher-student character”; therefore, the term could not be applied to an institution that merely summarized others’ research and sold the summaries to willing buyers

How later courts described this case

  • holding that the phrase “public institution of learning” in a tax statute may encompass more than “a college or academy in the traditional sense,” but that any such institution must have “a teacher-student character”; therefore, the term could not be applied to an institution that merely summarized others’ research and sold the summaries to willing buyers

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Holmes, J.,

dissenting. It is my view that Chemical Abstracts reasonably complies with the criteria of what would constitute a “public institution of learning,” as that term is used in R. C. 5709.07.

Chemical Abstracts is, in the first instance, a nonprofit organization dedicated to the general advancement of the knowledge of chemistry in all of its branches. The data gathered, abstracted and indexed is made available to those interested throughout the world—in my view, a process of learning of a high order.

In addition to the publishing of the abstracts of chemical data and chemical engineering research, Chemical Abstracts conducts courses in various fields of chemistry, languages and management training for its employees and offers other courses to the professional staff of various universities, all of which add greater weight to the determination that Chemical Abstracts does indeed meet the criteria for a “public institution of learning.”

The multifaceted educational activities and services performed by Chemical Abstracts may reasonably be likened to the activities of an academy of learning, rather than likened to a publishing house which was denied exemption in In re Estate of Taylor (1942), 139 Ohio St. 417 .

I would affirm the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.