Opinion

Union Camp Corp. v. Whitman

  • 54 Ohio St. 2d 159
  • 8 Ohio Op. 3d 155
  • 375 N.E.2d 417
  • 1978 Ohio LEXIS 539
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
May 3, 1978
Status
Published
Author
Herbert
On the bench
Broavn, Brown, Celebrezze, Heebert, Herbert, Locher, Neill, Sweeney
Cited by
23 cases
Authority
More cited than 15.1%

The opinion

Herbert, J.,

dissenting. I do not agree that this was a “special proceeding,” as that term appears in R. C. 2505.02. Although I concurred with Williams v. Akron ( 54 Ohio St. 2d 136 ), I doubt the wisdom of declaring appealable all interlocutory orders affecting substantial rights in matters before this administrative agency. Furthermore, the majority opinion does not indicate that any difference exists between this agency and all other such tribunals in the state.

O’Neill, C. J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.