Opinion

Interlake, Inc. v. Kosydar

42 Ohio St. 2d 457
71 Ohio Op. 2d 436
330 N.E.2d 444
1975 Ohio LEXIS 516

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Jun 18, 1975
Status: Published
Author: Brown
On the bench: Brown, Celebrezze, Cobeigan, Corrigan, Herbert, Neill, Stern
Cited by: 12 cases
Authority: More cited than 15.1%

The opinion

William B. Brown, J.,

concurring'. The dissenting opinion correctly states that “[u]nless our decision in Mead [Corp. v. Glander (1950), 153 Ohio St. 539 ] is to be overruled, we must hold herein that Interlake’s manufacturing process began when it converted coal to coke in its coke ovens.”

When this court decided Ohio Ferro-Alloys Corp. v. Kosydar (1973), 34 Ohio St. 2d 113 , I considered the Mead decision as being overruled. I join the majority in this case which reinforces that fact sub silentio.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.