Opinion

State v. Mishelek

  • 42 Ohio St. 2d 140
  • 71 Ohio Op. 2d 116
  • 326 N.E.2d 659
  • 1975 Ohio LEXIS 472
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Apr 23, 1975
Status
Published
Author
Herbert
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Corrigan, Herbert, Neal, Stern
Cited by
5 cases

The opinion

Herbert, J.,

dissenting. No decision of the United States Supreme Court yet requires us to hold as we did in Milanovich and as the majority does in the case at bar. Milanovich involved counsel appointed and paid by the state. The instant case concerns counsel retained and paid by the accused. I do not believe that the fair and orderly administration of criminal justice will be served by reaching the same result in both of these cases.

P. Brown, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.