Opinion

Canton Malleable Iron Co. v. Porterfield

  • 30 Ohio St. 2d 163
  • 59 Ohio Op. 2d 178
  • 283 N.E.2d 434
  • 1972 Ohio LEXIS 449
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
May 24, 1972
Status
Published
Author
Schneiderleach
On the bench
Brown, Corrigan, Herbert, Leach, Neill, Schneider, Stern
Cited by
41 cases

The opinion

Schneider and Leach, JJ.,

dissenting. If the items involved are not “adjuncts” to directly producing castings, it is virtually impossible to ascribe any meaning whatsoever to the General Assembly’s addition of that word to the statutes. Nor do we think the majority sufficiently resolves the dilemma of a statutory change without meaning.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.