Opinion

Jenkins v. Keller

  • 6 Ohio St. 2d 122
  • 35 Ohio Op. 2d 147
  • 216 N.E.2d 379
  • 1966 Ohio LEXIS 352
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Apr 27, 1966
Status
Published
Author
Schneider
On the bench
Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taut, Zimmerman
Cited by
85 cases

The opinion

Schneider, J.,

dissenting. In my opinion, the written matter contained on the form designated as C-110 and characterized by Judge Zimmerman as “a written agreement [entered into] at Youngstown” between the employee and employer is a material part of the “contract of employment.” Therefore, Section 4123.519, Revised Code, controls, so as to confer jurisdiction of this appeal upon the Court of Common Pleas of Ma-honing County. Accordingly, I would reverse. It is important to note that the administrator admits that he had jurisdiction of appellant’s claim. He merely contends that no appeal to court lies from the final administrative disposition of his decision on the claim adverse to the appellant.

Herbert, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.