Opinion

State ex rel. Wolson v. Kelly

  • 6 Ohio St. 2d 67
  • 35 Ohio Op. 2d 85
  • 215 N.E.2d 719
  • 1966 Ohio LEXIS 340
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Apr 8, 1966
Status
Published
Author
Schneider
On the bench
Browh, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taft, Zimmerman
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 15.0%

concluding a candidate for office substantially complied with the form required for declaration of candidacy because the document filed included all necessary elements, although it omitted the required precinct number

How later courts described this case

  • concluding a candidate for office substantially complied with the form required for declaration of candidacy because the document filed included all necessary elements, although it omitted the required precinct number

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Schneider, J.,

dissenting. The statute prescribes a form on which a blank for the precinct of residence is provided. It is neither for the Secretary of State nor for this court to question the reasonableness of the statutory requirement or to pick and choose whether this or that blank should be filled, in order to validate the petition. See State, ex rel. Reese, v. Bd. of Elections, 6 Ohio St. 2d 66 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.