Opinion

Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Gray

  • 1 Ohio St. 2d 97
  • 30 Ohio Op. 2d 337
  • 204 N.E.2d 683
  • 1965 Ohio LEXIS 569
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Feb 17, 1965
Status
Published
Author
Herbert
On the bench
Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Tart, Zimmerman
Cited by
7 cases

The opinion

Herbert, J.,

dissenting. Due to the advanced age of the respondent, his relative blindness from cataracts of each eye, accompanied by hepatitis which prevented an operation to remove the cataracts until April of 1962, which circumstance, his physician stated, “would certainly cloud his judgment, as far as I am concerned,” together with his present physical illness and the facts that he practiced law for nearly 40 years without a blemish on his record and that there was no loss to the trust estate by reason of his improvident speculation, I believe that suspension of the respondent from the practice of law for an indefinite period is sufficient to meet the requirements of justice.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.