Opinion

Helmer v. Vance

  • 24 Ohio Law. Abs. 259
Court
Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed
Mar 15, 1937
Status
Published
On the bench
Barnes, Gieger, Hornbeck
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Decided March 25, 1937

By THE COURT:

The above entitled action is now being determined on appellee’s application for rehearing.

Connected with the motion is the memo of claim and citation of authorities.

We have again examined the authorities cited in the light of the present argument, but still think the case of Norton v Blinn, 39 Oh St 145, is controlling and and determinative of the question herein. In the preparation and release of the original opinion we had in mind and considered all questions now presented through the application for rehearing.

The application will be overruled.

BARNES, PJ and HORNBECK, J, concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.