Opinion

State v. Currie

  • 19 N.C. App. 241
  • 198 S.E.2d 491
  • 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1622
Court
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Filed
Aug 22, 1973
Status
Published
Author
Baley
On the bench
Baley, Campbell, Hedrick
Cited by
6 cases

The opinion

Judge Baley

dissenting.

In my judgment the majority opinion places undue emphasis upon citizenship rights as they relate to the criminal statute involved.

By the passage of G.S. 14-415.1 the legislature made it unlawful for a convicted felon to possess firearms.

G.S. 14-415.2 granted an exemption for convicted felons whose citizenship had been restored under the law as it then existed.

Chapter 251 of the 1973 Session Laws automatically restores citizenship to all convicted felons.

The majority interprets Chapter 251 as effectively emasculating the Felony Firearms Act and permitting all convicted felons who have served their sentences to possess firearms. I disagree.

In my view G.S. 14-415.2 was applicable only to the law existing at the time it was passed. Chapter 251 negates and makes null and void the exemption concerning restoration of citizenship, not the penal statute itself, and thereby makes it an offense for all convicted felons to possess firearms without *245 regard to their restoration of citizenship. The federal Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. App., Sections 1201, et seq., contains a similar provision.

I do not think it is an arbitrary or unreasonable classification to forbid those who have committed felonies to possess firearms; I would affirm the conviction.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.