Opinion

Earle v. United States

  • 77 F. 744
  • 23 C.C.A. 438
  • 1 Alaska Fed. 483
  • 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2281
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Nov 16, 1896
Status
Published
Author
McKenna
On the bench
Gilbert, Knowles, McKenna
Cited by
7 cases

“They all had the usual ships’ supplies and stores and outfit for seal fishing.”

How later courts described this case

  • “They all had the usual ships’ supplies and stores and outfit for seal fishing.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

McKENNA, Circuit Judge

(concurring).

A careful review and consideration of the facts of this case convince me that the finding of the district court “that on the 19th day of June, 1892, within the United States, in the collection district of Alaska, and within the waters thereof, within four leagues of the coast of Alaska, and within the jurisdiction of this court,” the cargoes of the various vessels were transferred to the Coquitlam, is not sustained by the evidence; and I therefore concur in the judgment of reversal. On the other points decided by the majority of the court I express no opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.